2011). PSMA on live cells in microfluidic devices for the capture of LNCaPs, a PSMA-expressing immortalized prostate malignancy cell collection, over a range of concentrations and shear stresses relevant to immunocapture. Our results show that J591 outperforms J415 and a mix of the two for prostate malignancy capture, and that capture overall performance saturates following incubation with antibody concentrations of 10 micrograms per milliliter. Keywords: CTC, microfluidic, PSMA, J591, circulating tumor cell, prostate malignancy 1. Introduction Patients suffering from metastatic prostate malignancy (PCa) often shed tumor cells, called prostate circulating tumor cells (PCTCs), into the bloodstream (Allard, Matera et al. 2004; Danila, Heller et al. 2007). While these PCTCs are rare and are outnumbered by as much as 109 hematologic cells per PCTC in blood, it is believed that these circulating tumor cells (CTCs) contribute to metastatic progression (Krivacic, Ladanyi et al. 2004). PCTC enumeration has been shown clinically to be a valid prognostic indication of patient survival (Danila, Heller et al. 2007; de Bono, Scher et al. 2008; Scher, Jia et al. 2009). The capture of PCTCs may enable early clinical assessment of metastatic processes and chemotherapeutic responses, as well as genetic and pharmacological evaluation of malignancy cells. CTC isolation is usually inhibited by the uncertainty in defining appropriate enrichment techniques. Circulating nucleated cells (DAPI+) that show evidence of an epithelial history (EpCAM+, cytokeratin+) and are distinct (CD45-) from leukocytes are often classified as originating from the primary Mc-Val-Cit-PABC-PNP tumor and being related to metastasis (Allard, Matera et al. 2004; Coumans, Doggen et al. 2010). Use of Mc-Val-Cit-PABC-PNP these identifying characteristics is supported by statistical observations that high Mc-Val-Cit-PABC-PNP counts of CTCs defined in this fashion correlate with poor prognosis (Coumans, Doggen et al. 2010). CTCs are most commonly extracted from blood circulation through an enrichment process by positive selection with EpCAM (also called CD326), a pan-epithelial marker (Nagrath, Sequist et al. 2007; Shaffer, Leversha et al. 2007; Olmos, Arkenau et al. 2009; Stott, Hsu et al. 2010; Mc-Val-Cit-PABC-PNP Stott, Lee et al. 2010); this mechanism is employed by the CellSearch? system and by other immunocapture systems (Danila, Heller et al. 2007; de Bono, Scher et al. 2008; Olmos, Arkenau et al. 2009; Pantel and Alix-Panabires 2010; Riethdorf and Pantel 2010; Pratt, Huang et al. 2011). EpCAM has often been selected as the target transmembrane protein in immunocapture systems because of the epithelial origin of the cells of interest, but this approach may introduce biases due to the dynamic nature of EpCAM expression in circulating cells (Pantel and Alix-Panabires 2010). Importantly, patients with solid tumors and high CTC counts (as measured following EpCAM enrichment) have poor prognoses (Moreno, Miller et al. 2005; Danila, Heller et al. 2007; Cohen, Punt et al. 2008; de Bono, Scher et al. 2008; Olmos, Arkenau et al. 2009; Coumans, Doggen et al. 2010). Whereas EpCAM has been reported to correlate with invasiveness (Shiah, Tai et al. 2008), indicate oncogenic potential (Munz, Baeuerle et al. 2009), and be upregulated and correlate with proliferation in cell lines (Gostner, Fong et al. 2011), the role of EpCAM in metastatic malignancy is unclear. An important cellular phenotype switch, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), characteristic of many invading malignancy cells results in a cell’s loss of epithelial characteristics. This transition may cause some populations of CTCs to avoid extraction through epithelial-based (anti-EpCAM) capture techniques as EpCAM expression (Maheswaran and Haber 2010; Pantel and Alix-Panabires 2010) does not correlate with EMT markers (Mego, De Giorgi et al. 2009). Furthermore, markers expressed after EMT may be more important in predicting malignancy progression as they contribute to metastatic potential (Gradilone, Raimondi et al. 2011). EMT has been reported to increase a cell’s ability to become invasive, perhaps leading to a higher probability of tumorigenicity; thus, cells more aggressive in the generation of new tumors might not be isolated by EpCAM enrichment (Pantel and Alix-Panabires 2010). In prostate tissues, including PCTCs, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA; also know as: folate hydrolase 1; glutamate carboxypeptidase II), a type II transmembrane metallopeptidase, is Mc-Val-Cit-PABC-PNP usually a well-established ligand KT3 tag antibody that is accessible to antibodies (Liu, Moy et al. 1997; Chang, Reuter et al. 1999; Bander, Nanus et al. 2003; Davis, Bennett et al. 2005). Virtually all prostate cancer main tumors express PSMA (Wright, Haley et al. 1995; Murphy, Elgamal et al. 1998;.